Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
The idea came from Patrick Byrne. His site <http://www.firstclasseducation.org/> shows 'waste' with examples like "...Thousands of dollars in federal funds intended to assist poor D.C. schoolchildren _appear_ to have been spent instead by school administrators on retreats and unapproved travel...." citing a Washington Times article. (emphasis mine). Maybe an Arizona member can discuss the referendum. George Will, sure that the initiative will sweep the union, says, "His idea -- call it the 65 Percent Solution -- is politically delicious because it unites parents, taxpayers and teachers while, he hopes, sowing dissension in the ranks of the teachers unions, which he considers the principal institutional impediment to improving primary and secondary education." And at the same time, notes that it may have no effect on quality of learning <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38726-2005Apr8.html> (reg may be required, or look up in database) (oddly, look at that column, then check http://www.battlecry-ca.com/article.php?aid=1904, I think one strongly influenced the other). There is also a good discussion at <http://www.kaet.asu.edu/horizon/transcripts/2005/april/apr7_2005.htm> Robert Eiffert Librarian, Pacific MS Vancouver WA pac.egreen.wednet.edu/library beiffert@egreen.wednet.edu Librarian in the Middle Blog: beiffert.net robert@beiffert.net Lorriane Smith wrote: > This information first appeared in the news about 6 months ago in > Texas. I believe a reply has already been posted in answer to the > claim of "getting rid of" books. > > A much scarier thing is happening in Texas than UT relocating 90,000 > volumes. The governor has "decreed" (like a king) that 65% of the > school budget must be spent on classroom activities such as teacher > salaries and materials. At first glance this may sound like a good > thing...read on. > > This new law includes after school extracurricular activities such as > football and band, but *excludes" libraries! > > Other states are considering this idea. An article in today's Austin > American-Statesman newspaper, says that this is an attempt to divide > administration and teachers and get more people to vote for vouchers > and charter schools. > > Not only are these politicians trying to kill off public education, > they obviously don't know that libraries are closely tied to student > achievement and classroom learning. > > Now this is something to get upset about. I hope this information also > makes it to the national newspapers. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------