Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I feel I need to put in my 2 cents on this topic. However, I have a disclaimer, in that I am now a community college librarian, but we get students right out of HS, and we deal with some of the same issues found on this listserv. (a lot of the students I instruct are taking developmental courses, meaning they have not tested into college level courses, although they graduated from HS. Plus research is a weak spot for almost all the students I come into contact with.) Personally, I think if a student is just learning to do research, they need to be directed to sites. They have to be taught how to do research as well as web evaluation - two very different things. (I don't believe these topics should be taught together - research first using hard copies and directed sites, then web evaluation. This listserv posts on web evaluation websites are great for this purpose.) I have to agree that not everything on Wikipedia is for the younger set - even encyclopedias have versions for the younger set, which takes into account their maturity and reading level. I believe the conversation about using wikipedia should start in middle school, when students are doing more self directed research. I am a fan of wikipedia, but I would not use it as a source. It is great to find info fast, especially ephemeral or pop culture info. The value of wikipedia is in the references/citations at the bottom of the entries. If a site is truly reliable, the creator(s) will have cited all their sources. (take a look at the star trek or star wars sites - those creators are dedicated to be sure all info is correct!) In reality, Wikipedia is nothing more than a secondary source. The citations take you to the primary source, which is what should be taught to be cited. I think the same should be true of encyclopedias, unless there is a reason that the encyclopedia is the ONLY source to be found on it (which I would find hard to believe) or the assignment is to find some general info, pre-research, which I would then would allow wikipedia. Of course, always citing any sources. My opinion is always to educate versus filter/restrict. When you educate, students can take that information with them, assisting them as they go out into the world or go further in their education. But, this is just my 2 cents... Theresa Theresa Stanley librarian Pima Community College 1255 N Stone Ave Tucson AZ 85709 520-206-7267 Online Instructor PODetc 203 Prospect Ave Long Beach CA 90803 1-800-408-4935 tstanley@podetc.com On Feb 2, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Cathy Rettberg wrote: > These are both interesting viewpoints. I am one of the people who > tells students to use an encyclopedia (including wikipedia) if > necessary to find keywords and ideas, and to then research more > deeply and not cite encyclopedias. Wikipedia can also be a good > source for authoritative sources, if the page is well footnoted. But > then we tell the students not to include these sources in their > bibliographies, as we only want to see their authoritative sources. > Tom is right - that is ignoring a part of the research process. How > then (and this is basically for Tom) would you deal with truly non- > authoritative websites? What if a student goes to a random > Geocities site and finds accurate information that is supported by > other, more authoritative sites? Would you include the "bad" > research sites along with the "good" ones because they were part of > the process? > > For my part I think I will stick to teaching students to only > include sites that we (the students, teacher and I) have deemed > reliable. We do a unit on source authority in US History that plays > into this idea though: students have to create a "good" > bibliography, using authoritative sources, and a "bad" bibiography, > using lesser sources. The bibs are on opposite sides of a page; the > students then exchange papers, determine which side is the less > authoritative bib, and find better sources for each others' topics. > The assignment is called "Born to Be Bad." The kids enjoy the > intellectual challenge - it went over very well this year. > > I know there is a need to continually revisit the Wikipedia issue, > as our view of source authority will continue to change as > information flows ever more freely. It's so interesting!!! > > Cathy > ----------- > Cathy Rettberg > Head Librarian, Menlo School > Atherton, CA > crettberg@menloschool.org > > > > > On Feb 2, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Gustafson, Jean wrote: > >> I believe, when a teacher says you cannot cite World Book or >> Wikipedia type sources, what they really are saying, is DO NOT even >> go look at them. >> >> Jean >> >> R. Jean Gustafson >> Teacher-Librarian >> Selah Jr. High >> Selah, WA 98942 >> jeangustafson@selah.k12.wa.us >> -----Original Message----- >> From: School Library Media & Network Communications >[mailto:LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU >> ] On Behalf Of Thomas Kaun >> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:55 AM >> To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU >> Subject: Re: Why NOT Wikapedia >> >> Hi, Kristina. >> I'm not sure why a student or any researcher, using the information >> they got >> from Wikipedia would not cite it. This just drives me crazy. If the >> teacher >> or professor wants to restrict students use of Wikipedia or ensure >> that >> other resources are used to verify the information found there that >> doesn't >> absolve the researcher's obligation to cite the source no matter how >> inaccurate, in error, or whatever, that source is. The issue is not >> citation--it's use--and that has to be determined by the teacher. >> Some >> teachers also don't want kids to use general encyclopedias and they >> say the >> same thing, "Don't cite the World Book or Britannica." Once again >> that >> doesn't make sense to me. If you are using it as a source then you >> should be >> citing it. >> I know this is long answer to a short question but it just pushes >> my buttons >> when we and other teachers don't seem to understand the purpose of >> citation >> and are giving their students the wrong message about what and why >> to cite. >> Tom Kaun >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Kris Fallon >> <librarychickie@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Looking for some brief hard cold facts as to why wikapedia is >>> should not be >>> a "citeable" source for research. Presenting to faculty today and >>> there >>> are >>> some big advocates of it who will claim it is just as reliable as >>> Worldbook. >>> >>> Kristina Fallon Tomaino >>> Robert Morris School, LMS k-8 >>> South Bound Brook NJ >>> librarychickie@gmail.com >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. >>> You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings >>> by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. >>> To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu >>> In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL >>> 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. >>> * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ >>> * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ >>> * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ >>> * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html >>> * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas T. Kaun >> Teacher Librarian >> Bessie Chin Library @ Redwood High School >> 395 Doherty Drive, Larkspur, CA 94939 >> tomkaun@gmail.com | Library Web site: http://rhslibrary.org | >> Professional >> development blog: http://tomlmt2.blogspot.com/ | Library news blog: >> http://libraryleaves.blogspot.com >> >> Read, every day, something no one else is reading. Think, every day, >> something no one else is thinking. Do, every day, something no one >> else >> would be silly enough to do. It is bad for the mind to be always >> part of >> unanimity. >> - Christopher Morley >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. >> You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings >> by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. >> To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu >> In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL >> 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. >> * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ >> * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ >> * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ >> * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html >> * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. >> You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings >> by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. >> To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu >> In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL >> 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. >> * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ >> * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ >> * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ >> * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html >> * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. > You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings > by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. > To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu > In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL > 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. > * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ > * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ > * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ > * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html > * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > On Feb 2, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Cathy Rettberg wrote: > These are both interesting viewpoints. I am one of the people who > tells students to use an encyclopedia (including wikipedia) if > necessary to find keywords and ideas, and to then research more > deeply and not cite encyclopedias. Wikipedia can also be a good > source for authoritative sources, if the page is well footnoted. But > then we tell the students not to include these sources in their > bibliographies, as we only want to see their authoritative sources. > Tom is right - that is ignoring a part of the research process. How > then (and this is basically for Tom) would you deal with truly non- > authoritative websites? What if a student goes to a random > Geocities site and finds accurate information that is supported by > other, more authoritative sites? Would you include the "bad" > research sites along with the "good" ones because they were part of > the process? > > For my part I think I will stick to teaching students to only > include sites that we (the students, teacher and I) have deemed > reliable. We do a unit on source authority in US History that plays > into this idea though: students have to create a "good" > bibliography, using authoritative sources, and a "bad" bibiography, > using lesser sources. The bibs are on opposite sides of a page; the > students then exchange papers, determine which side is the less > authoritative bib, and find better sources for each others' topics. > The assignment is called "Born to Be Bad." The kids enjoy the > intellectual challenge - it went over very well this year. > > I know there is a need to continually revisit the Wikipedia issue, > as our view of source authority will continue to change as > information flows ever more freely. It's so interesting!!! > > Cathy > ----------- > Cathy Rettberg > Head Librarian, Menlo School > Atherton, CA > crettberg@menloschool.org > > > > > On Feb 2, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Gustafson, Jean wrote: > >> I believe, when a teacher says you cannot cite World Book or >> Wikipedia type sources, what they really are saying, is DO NOT even >> go look at them. >> >> Jean >> >> R. Jean Gustafson >> Teacher-Librarian >> Selah Jr. High >> Selah, WA 98942 >> jeangustafson@selah.k12.wa.us >> -----Original Message----- >> From: School Library Media & Network Communications >[mailto:LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU >> ] On Behalf Of Thomas Kaun >> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:55 AM >> To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU >> Subject: Re: Why NOT Wikapedia >> >> Hi, Kristina. >> I'm not sure why a student or any researcher, using the information >> they got >> from Wikipedia would not cite it. This just drives me crazy. If the >> teacher >> or professor wants to restrict students use of Wikipedia or ensure >> that >> other resources are used to verify the information found there that >> doesn't >> absolve the researcher's obligation to cite the source no matter how >> inaccurate, in error, or whatever, that source is. The issue is not >> citation--it's use--and that has to be determined by the teacher. >> Some >> teachers also don't want kids to use general encyclopedias and they >> say the >> same thing, "Don't cite the World Book or Britannica." Once again >> that >> doesn't make sense to me. If you are using it as a source then you >> should be >> citing it. >> I know this is long answer to a short question but it just pushes >> my buttons >> when we and other teachers don't seem to understand the purpose of >> citation >> and are giving their students the wrong message about what and why >> to cite. >> Tom Kaun >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Kris Fallon >> <librarychickie@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Looking for some brief hard cold facts as to why wikapedia is >>> should not be >>> a "citeable" source for research. Presenting to faculty today and >>> there >>> are >>> some big advocates of it who will claim it is just as reliable as >>> Worldbook. >>> >>> Kristina Fallon Tomaino >>> Robert Morris School, LMS k-8 >>> South Bound Brook NJ >>> librarychickie@gmail.com >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. >>> You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings >>> by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. >>> To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu >>> In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL >>> 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. >>> * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ >>> * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ >>> * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ >>> * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html >>> * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas T. Kaun >> Teacher Librarian >> Bessie Chin Library @ Redwood High School >> 395 Doherty Drive, Larkspur, CA 94939 >> tomkaun@gmail.com | Library Web site: http://rhslibrary.org | >> Professional >> development blog: http://tomlmt2.blogspot.com/ | Library news blog: >> http://libraryleaves.blogspot.com >> >> Read, every day, something no one else is reading. Think, every day, >> something no one else is thinking. Do, every day, something no one >> else >> would be silly enough to do. It is bad for the mind to be always >> part of >> unanimity. >> - Christopher Morley >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. >> You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings >> by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. >> To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu >> In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL >> 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. >> * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ >> * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ >> * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ >> * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html >> * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. >> You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings >> by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. >> To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu >> In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL >> 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. >> * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ >> * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ >> * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ >> * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html >> * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. > You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings > by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. > To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu > In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL > 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. > * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ > * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ > * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ > * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html > * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------